Summary
This research article presents a controlled study comparing GPT-4, GPT-3.5, and ELIZA in a Turing test. Human participants conversed with these systems to determine if they could distinguish AI from humans. Results showed GPT-4 was misidentified as human 54% of the time, highlighting the potential for AI deception in social interactions. The findings raise important questions about machine intelligence and the societal implications of indistinguishable AI.
