Gap Analysis of Code Scanners

This research report focuses on the limitations of Static Application Security Testing (SAST) tools in identifying security vulnerabilities during software development. It outlines the various types of static analysis tools and emphasizes that relying solely on code scanners is insufficient for ensuring application security and compliance. The report discusses the common techniques employed by scanners, such as data flow analysis, control flow analysis, symbolic analysis, and taint analysis, while highlighting the inherent challenges these methods face, including the generation of false positives and false negatives. The document argues for the necessity of complementary tools and processes, specifically Secure Software Requirements Management (SSRM), to effectively address security vulnerabilities that scanners cannot detect. The report aims to educate software developers and security professionals about the gaps in current scanning methodologies and the importance of a more holistic approach to security.